Ashton v. United States

79 F.3d 1152 77 A.F.T.R.2d 96 -1438 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leonard ASHTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES; Internal Revenue Service (IRS); Nielsen, Arras, Daddazio, Polivka, IRS Employees; Governor Wilson; California Franchise Tax Board; Park, President, Oliver & Williams Elevator Co. (O & W); McLaughlin, Paymaster, O & W, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-55650. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1996. * Decided March 18, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leonard Ashton appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and affirm. 3 Ashton, a former employee of Oliver & Williams Elevator Co. (O & W), filed this action on April 2, 1993. Ashton…