Michael L. Alexander v. Frank Prewitt Larry McKinstry Frank Sauser Allen Cooper Robert Spinde Larry Kincheloe

79 F.3d 1152 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael L. ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank PREWITT; Larry McKinstry; Frank Sauser; Allen Cooper; Robert Spinde; Larry Kincheloe, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35534. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1996. * Decided March 18, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael L. Alexander appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and affirm. 3 Alexander contends defendants conspired to violate his free speech and equal protection rights when they transferred him and changed his classification level after he made threatening statements about the superintendent of the prison.…