Michael Henry Ferdik v. James Gaspar Jeff Hood

79 F.3d 1152 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael Henry FERDIK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GASPAR; Jeff Hood, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16815. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1996. * Decided March 18, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Henry Ferdik, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment in favor of prison officials, following a limited remand from this court, in Ferdik's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After a bench trial, the district court concluded that defendants did not act with deliberate indifference to Ferdik's serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review a district court's factual findings for clear error. Brooker v. Desert Hosp. Corp., 947 F.2d 412, 414 (9th Cir.1991). We review a district court's conclusions of law de novo.…