Martinez v. Kama, Lt.

79 F.3d 1153 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marshall MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAMA, Lt., Chairperson, Adjustment Committee Members; Kotsubo, Member, Adjustment Committee; Pait, A.C.O.; Young, Member, Adjustment Committee, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15159. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1996. * Decided March 18, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marshall Martinez appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and affirm. 3 On August 26, 1992, Martinez verbally threatened a prison guard. The guard wrote him up for that incident. Martinez was found guilty of misconduct and sentenced to 53 days in disciplinary…