In Re Ronald C. MacIntyre Mary M. Pikus, Debtors. Philip A. Demassa, Apc Philip A. Demassa v. Ronald C. MacIntyre Mary M. Pikus

79 F.3d 1153 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Ronald C. MacINTYRE; Mary M. Pikus, Debtors. Philip A. DeMASSA, APC; Philip A. DeMassa, Appellants, v. Ronald C. MacINTYRE; Mary M. Pikus, Appellees. No. 95-55617. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 15, 1995. Decided March 6, 1996. 1 Before: ALARCON, RYMER, Circuit Judges, and QUACKENBUSH, Senior District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Plaintiffs-Appellants Philip A. DeMassa and Philip A. DeMassa, APC (collectively "DeMassa"), appeal an order of the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") affirming an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California (the "bankruptcy court") dismissing DeMassa's Complaint Objecting to Discharge. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d) and affirm. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 4 On July 31, 1990, Philip DeMassa entered into a contract to sell his home in Point Loma,…