Kevin Milnes v. Fletcher Pacific Construction Co., Ltd.

79 F.3d 1153 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kevin MILNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLETCHER PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD., Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-15205. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1996. * Decided March 18, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kevin Milnes appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for Fletcher Pacific Construction Co., Ltd. ("Fletcher") in his Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000e) action alleging that Fletcher improperly discharged him on account of his race (caucasian) and refused to rehire him in retaliation for his filing a discrimination claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"). We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Sengupta v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc., 804 F.2d 1072, 1074 (9th Cir.1986). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Milnes makes several…