Lisa Frank, Inc. v. P.C. Woo, Inc., Dba Mega Toys, a California Corporation

79 F.3d 1153 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. LISA FRANK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. P.C. WOO, INC., dba Mega Toys, a California corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-56605. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1996. * Decided March 14, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 P.C. Woo, Inc. ("P.C. Woo") appeals the district court's grant of a preliminary injunction barring P.C. Woo from importing, purchasing, manufacturing, selling, advertising or displaying certain toys confusingly similar to Lisa Frank Inc.'s ("LFI") products and from reproducing or imitating LFI's trade dress. P.C. Woo contends that the district court abused its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction by finding that LFI was likely to succeed on its trade dress infringement claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (a)(1), and we affirm. 3 The district court's preliminary injunction will be…