Jackeline Marquez Rocio Andrade v. Miguel A. Andrade, and City of Burlingame Alfred J. Palmer, Chief of Police, and Richard Harman

79 F.3d 1153 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jackeline MARQUEZ; Rocio Andrade, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Miguel A. ANDRADE, Plaintiff, and City of Burlingame; Alfred J. Palmer, Chief of Police, and Richard Harman, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15794. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1995. * Decided March 13, 1996. 1 Before: KOZINSKI and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and SILVER ** , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Plaintiffs were attacked and bitten by a police dog during an investigatory stop. They filed suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , claiming that conduct on the part of Officer Richard Harman and the City of Burlingame police department constituted an unreasonable seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment and a deprivation of personal security guaranteed under Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process principles. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. Plaintiffs appealed. We have…