Villa-Lozano

United States v. Villa-Lozano

Good Law
10 F. App'x 574
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 2001No. 00-10429; D.C. No. CR-00-00073-DAECalifornia206 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Ramon Villa-Lozano appeals the judgment of conviction and 96-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Villa-Lozano contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court improperly imposed a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) because the government neither pled in the indictment nor established through the guilty plea that Villa-Lozano had sustained a prior aggravated felony conviction. He also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense). These arguments are foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), as amended (Feb. 8, 2001), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 1503 , — L.Ed.2d — (2001).

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.