Steven G. Strowski, Aka: Steve Strowski v. Arnold Kupetz Rosendo Gonzalez

Good Law
79 F.3d 1154·1996 WL 119520·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17240
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 199695-55297California462 words

Opinion

Opinion

79 F.3d 1154 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steven G. STROWSKI, aka: Steve Strowski, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arnold KUPETZ; Rosendo Gonzalez, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55297. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1996. * Decided March 18, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Chapter 7 debtor Steven Strowski attempts to appeal pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal with prejudice of his action against Chapter 7 trustee Arnold Kupetz and his counsel, Rosendo Gonzalez (collectively "defendants") seeking relief from the bankruptcy court's November 19, 1990 judgment denying Strowski and his wife a discharge. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d), and we affirm. 3 Here, Strowski's notice of appeal indicated that he appealed from the district court's underlying judgment as well as from the district court's denial of his motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.