In Re Shop Television Network, Inc., Debtor. Shop Television Network, Inc. v. Hillel Chodos, and Fierstein & Sturman Law Corporation

Good Law
79 F.3d 1154·1996 WL 102580·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17254
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 199694-56225California2,827 words

Opinion

Opinion

79 F.3d 1154 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re SHOP TELEVISION NETWORK, INC., Debtor. SHOP TELEVISION NETWORK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hillel CHODOS, Defendant-Appellant, and Fierstein & Sturman Law Corporation, Defendant. No. 94-56225. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 6, 1996. Decided March 6, 1996. Before: POOLE, WIGGINS, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Hillel Chodos, an attorney, appeals pro se the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's turnover order, which directed Chodos to return $283,498.38 in excessive attorney's fees to Shop Television Network, Inc. ("STN"), in an adversary action related to STN's bankruptcy. 1 He contends that the turnover order should be vacated because the dismissal of the bankruptcy action pending the appeal of the turnover order to the district court deprived the bankruptcy court of subject matter jurisdiction. Alternatively, he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.