In Re Roxford Foods Litigation. Purina Mills, Inc., Plaintiff--Cross-Appellee v. Civic Center Square, Inc. Caisse Nationale De Credit Agricole, and John Tutelian, Defendant--Cross-Appellant. In Re Roxford Foods Litigation. Purina Mills, Inc. v. Civil Center Square, Inc. John Tutelian Caisse Nationale De Credit Agricole

Good Law
79 F.3d 1154·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17246
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 199694-15148California3,301 words

Opinion

Opinion

79 F.3d 1154 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re ROXFORD FOODS LITIGATION. PURINA MILLS, INC., Plaintiff--Cross-Appellee, v. CIVIC CENTER SQUARE, INC.; Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole, Defendants, and John TUTELIAN, Defendant--Cross-Appellant. In re ROXFORD FOODS LITIGATION. PURINA MILLS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CIVIL CENTER SQUARE, INC.; John Tutelian; Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 94-15148, 94-15100. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 1995. Decided March 13, 1996. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and WHALEY * , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 This action arises out of losses suffered by Purina Mills, Inc. ("Purina") when Roxford Foods, Inc. ("Roxford") closed in 1989, thereby breaching the Turkey Marketing and Management Agreement between the two companies. After obtaining judgement on this issue, and upon realizing that Roxford was insolvent, Purina…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.