Norbert Schueller v. Michael Edgar Karen Hernandez Diane Lassor Nanette Names City of Martinez Officer Miller Officer Leong Does, 1 to 10, Inclusive

79 F.3d 1154 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Norbert SCHUELLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael EDGAR; Karen Hernandez; Diane Lassor; Nanette Names; City of Martinez; Officer Miller; Officer Leong; Does, 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17000. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 16, 1996. * Decided March 13, 1996. Before: HUG, HALL, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff-appellant Norbert A. Schueller, pro se, appeals the district court order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment and denying his cross-motion for summary judgment. 3 Because appellant failed to demonstrate that any genuine issue of material fact exists, we affirm. I. 4 Appellant alleges that the City of Martinez, Officers Miller and Leong and individual defendants Diane Lassor, Michael Edgar and Nanette Names denied him his civil rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Appellant's claim, however, cannot survive a…