Warren

United States v. Warren

Good Law
10 F. App'x 577
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 2001No. 00-10318; D.C. No. CR-99-40254-DLJCalifornia185 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Derrick Lamar Warren appeals his guilty plea conviction for one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Warren contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g) is unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause in light of United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 , 115 S.Ct. 1624 , 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 , 120 S.Ct. 1740 , 146 L.Ed.2d 658 (2000), and Jones v. United States, 529 U.S. 848 , 120 S.Ct. 1904 , 146 L.Ed.2d 902 (2000). As Warren concedes, however, this court’s rejection of that ar *578 gument in United States v. Jones, 231 F.3d 508, 514-15 (9th Cir.2000) is dispositive. 1

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *578 courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

. Warren's request for an initial hearing en banc is denied as untimely. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(c).