United States v. Richard A. Gill, United States of America v. Kim Loren McCauley

Good Law
79 F.3d 1154·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17232
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 199695-30031California1,429 words

Opinion

Opinion

79 F.3d 1154 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard A. GILL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kim Loren MCCAULEY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-30370, 95-30031 and 95-90043. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 8, 1996. Decided March 19, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, NOONAN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Kim Loren McCauley and Richard A. Gill appeal the district court's denial of their motions to suppress. Both were convicted following conditional guilty pleas, McCauley for manufacture of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), and Gill for control of a building used in the manufacture of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856 (a)(2). We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 3 * A 4 McCauley argues that the search warrant affidavit contained material omissions that were reckless or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.