Camarillo-Vasquez

United States v. Camarillo-Vasquez

Good Law
10 F. App'x 578
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 30, 2001No. 00-10293; D.C. No. CR-99-00422-JBR/LRLCalifornia278 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Miguel Camarillo-Vasquez appeals the judgment of conviction and 51-month sentence following his guilty plea to a single count of being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) and (b)(2). Camarillo-Vasquez contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court improperly imposed a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) because the government neither pled in the indictment nor established through the guilty plea that Camirillo-Vasquez had sustained a prior aggravated felony conviction. He also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense). These arguments are foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), as amended, (Feb. 8, 2001), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 1503 , —L.Ed.2d — (2001). Accordingly, the sentence is affirmed.

We remand for the limited purpose of directing the district court to amend the judgment to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.