Zankich v. Phoenix Cardiologists, P.C.

Good Law
79 F.3d 1155·1996 WL 118548·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17214
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 199694-16692California862 words

Opinion

Opinion

79 F.3d 1155 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James Vincent ZANKICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHOENIX CARDIOLOGISTS, P.C.; Sherman Minkoff, MD, individually and in his official capacity as Physician-Stockholder of Phoenix Cardiologists, P.C.; Ira B. Ehrlich, MD, individually and in his official capacity as Physician-Stockholder of Phoenix Cardiologists, P.C.; John W. Fitzgerald, MD, individually and in his official capacity as Physician-Stockholder of Phoenix Cardiologists, P.C.; Neal A. Klein, MD, individually and in his official capacity as Physician-Stockholder of Phoenix Cardiologists, P.C., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16692. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1996. * Decided March 18, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James V. Zankich, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his medical malpractice action as time-barred. Zankich contends…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.