United States v. Sylina Shun-Yun Tai

79 F.3d 1155 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sylina Shun-Yun TAI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-56326. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1996. * Decided March 14, 1996. Before: BROWNING, WALLACE, and FARRIS, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Tai appeals from the district court's judgment ordering revocation of her United States citizenship by canceling her certificate of naturalization. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 2 Following a bench trial, we will not set aside the judge's findings of fact, whether based on oral or documentary evidence, unless they are clearly erroneous. See Price v. United States Navy, 39 F.3d 1011, 1021 (9th Cir.1994). We review the judge's conclusions of law de novo. Id. 3 "As a general rule, fundamental fairness requires that…