Decker

*614 MEMORANDUM **

Carol J. Decker (“Decker”) appeals the district court’s grant of summaiy judgment in favor of General Services Administration (“GSA”). Decker claims that there are genuine issues of material fact regarding her claims that (1) GSA discriminated against her on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII when it hired a male job applicant and not her for a position as Transportation Motors Officer (2) various GSA employees retaliated against her for filing EEOC complaints and (3) GSA subjected her to a hostile work environment that resulted in her constructive discharge. Because we conclude that the district court correctly determined that there were no issues of material fact as to Decker’s sex discrimination claim, and because we conclude that Decker’s other two claims are not properly presented in this appeal, we affirm.

As for Decker’s sex discrimination claim, she takes aim at the explanation proffered by decisionmaker Michael Snodgrass (“Snodgrass”) for hiring Jacques Muije (“Muije”) instead of her. Most particularly, Decker claims that there is no basis in Muije’s application for Snodgrass’ statement that Muije had “direct experience in fleet management,”…