96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 520, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 849 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert P. Aguilar, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Good Law
80 F.3d 329
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 199691-10024California4,210 words

Opinion

Opinion

80 F.3d 329 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 520 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 849 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Robert P. AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Nos. 90-10597, 91-10024. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 21, 1995. Decided Jan. 25, 1996. Robert D. Luskin and Joseph G. Davis, Comey Boyd & Luskin, Washington, D.C., Paul B. Meltzer, Meltzer & Leeming, Santa Cruz, California, for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee. Patty M. Stemler and Sara M. Lord, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, SCHROEDER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge HUG; Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ. HUG, Circuit Judge: 1 The appellant, United States District Judge Robert Aguilar, was charged with five criminal violations. Trial was held on August 1, 1990. The jury acquitted him of three of the charges and convicted him of two. The convictions were for one count of illegally disclosing a wiretap application in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.