96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 520, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 849 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert P. Aguilar, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Opinion
Opinion
80 F.3d 329 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 520 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 849 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Robert P. AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Nos. 90-10597, 91-10024. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 21, 1995. Decided Jan. 25, 1996. Robert D. Luskin and Joseph G. Davis, Comey Boyd & Luskin, Washington, D.C., Paul B. Meltzer, Meltzer & Leeming, Santa Cruz, California, for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee. Patty M. Stemler and Sara M. Lord, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, SCHROEDER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge HUG; Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ. HUG, Circuit Judge: 1 The appellant, United States District Judge Robert Aguilar, was charged with five criminal violations. Trial was held on August 1, 1990. The jury acquitted him of three of the charges and convicted him of two. The convictions were for one count of illegally disclosing a wiretap application in…