UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro Arias HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Bad Law
80 F.3d 1253·96 Daily Journal DAR 1013·1996 WL 34822·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1235·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 677
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 199695-30007California3,790 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boochever, J.

On September 27, 1994, a jury returned guilty verdicts against Pedro Arias Hernandez on one count of using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1) (1994), and on one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1) (1994). The charges were based on events that took place on April 27, 1989, and evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant issued that same day.

On appeal, Hernandez argues that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the § 924(c)(1) conviction because he did not “use” or “carry” a firearm; (2) the § 924(c)(1) charge should have been dismissed because the government did not charge a separate drug trafficking crime, and that crime is now beyond the statute of limitations; (3) the evidence seized should have been suppressed because the search warrant lacked probable cause; (4) the evidence seized should have been suppressed because the search warrant affiant deliberately or recklessly included false statements in and omitted material information from the search warrant application; (5) the government has engaged in vindictive prosecution; and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.