Chang v. Chen

Good Law
80 F.3d 1293·96 Daily Journal DAR 3847·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6289·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2293
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 199694-55583California4,542 words

Opinion

Opinion

80 F.3d 1293 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 9012 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2293 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3847 Ming-Chu CHANG; Kang-Jye Chen; Ching-Chieh Chang; A.C.I. Trading Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Fu-Nan Chen, aka, George Chen, Plaintiff, v. Shu-Jen Tseng CHEN, Defendant, and Eugene Gabrych; Marian Gabrych; Eddie Lin, aka, Eddy C. Lin, aka, Chi-Chang Lin, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55583. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 18, 1995. Decided April 4, 1996. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Mariana R. Pfaelzer, District Judge, Presiding. No. CV-92-05905-MRP. Mark Riera, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Thomas C. Mundell, Mundell, Odlum & Haws, San Bernardino, California, and Linda Monroe, Law Office of Timothy S. Harris, Los Angeles, California, for the defendants-appellees. Before: POOLE, BOOCHEVER, and O'Scannlain, Circuit Judges. OPINION BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge: 1 Ming-Chu Chang, Kang-Jye Chen, Ching-Chieh Chang and A.C.I. Trading, Inc. (collectively "Appellants") appeal a district court decision that dismissed their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.