Nunez-Guzman

Nunez-Guzman v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
11 F. App'x 866
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 6, 2001No. 99-70245; INS Nos. A75-266-467, A75-266-466California279 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Melquíades Nunez-Guzman and Maria De La Luz Robles-Mariscal (husband and wife “Petitioners”) were served with Notices to Appear (“NTAs”) charging them with attempted entry without inspection in violation of section 212(a)(6)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a). The facts and prior proceedings are known to the parties and are not restated herein except as necessary.

Before an Immigration Judge (“IJ”), Petitioners admitted the alleged facts and conceded removability, but argued that they should have been processed in deportation proceedings rather than removal proceedings because they had requested deportation proceedings before April 1, 1997, the effective date of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”), 110 Stat. 3009 -625.

The IJ denied Petitioners’ request that removal proceedings be terminated and converted into deportation proceedings, and granted voluntary departure. On appeal, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) determined that Petitioners were properly in removal proceedings and that suspension of deportation was unavailable. The BIA dismissed Petitioners’ appeal. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.