Wang
Wang v. Regents of University of California
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
After de novo review, 1 we affirm the judgment of the district court. There is no evidence in the record based on which a reasonable jury could conclude that the reasons offered by Samuel Cheung for ter *881 minating Joyce Wang’s employment were pretextual. The evidence is uncontradicted that Cheung terminated Wang on the basis of her inability to work appropriately with her colleagues. 2
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. See Weiner v. San Diego County, 210 F.3d *881 1025, 1028 (9th Cir.2000).
. See Nelson v. Pima Community College, 83 F.3d 1075 , 1081 (9th Cir.1996); Wallis v. J.R. Simplot Co., 26 F.3d 885, 890 (9th Cir. 1994).