Holm

United States v. Holm

Good Law
11 F. App'x 962
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 2001No. 00-56067; D.C. No. CV-96-07647-MMM-VAPCalifornia245 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The United States complied with the jurisdictional requirements of 26 U.S.C. §§ 7401 and 7403. Publication of a delegation order was not required to effect a valid delegation of the Secretary of Treasury to commence this action. United States v. Saunders, 951 F.2d 1065, 1067-68 (9th Cir.1991). The suit was validly authorized by the delegate of the Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service. Contrary to the Holms’ argument, a United States Attorney is authorized to commence an action to convert an Internal Revenue Service assessment into a judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 547 (2). Further, a United States Attorney may delegate an assistant United States Attorney to commence such an action on her behalf. 28 U.S.C. § 542 .

*963 The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Holms’ motion to reopen discovery given the Holms’ lack of diligence in pursuing discovery prior to the discovery deadline and the Holms’ refusal to meet with IRS agents prior to trial.

Finally, after a careful review of the record and consideration of the arguments presented, we conclude that the judgment of assessment was supported by the evidence and was not arbitrary or capricious.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.