California Housing Securities, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
California Housing Securities, Inc. (“CHS”) appeals an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The district court concluded that the FDIC, as successor to the Resolution Trust Corporation as receiver for Saratoga Savings and Loan Association (“Saratoga”), was entitled to a federal income tax refund that CHS sought from the Internal Revenue Service. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.
CHS has presented no evidence to contradict the undisputed evidence that Saratoga performed the loan servicing operations and recorded the income and loss on its books. 1 CHS’s statements on its tax returns, attributing the income and loss to Saratoga, constitute further evidence that Saratoga earned the income and suffered the loss that generated the tax refund. CHS has failed to cite any law in support of its argument that the income and loss should be reallocated from Saratoga to itself, and its declaration, stating that it is entitled to the refund when the income is reallocated, merely begs the question. 2 “Absent any differing agreement ... a tax refund resulting solely…