Barkley

United States v. Barkley

Good Law
12 F. App'x 547
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 2001No. 00-10558; D.C. No. CR-00-00488-EHCCalifornia256 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Kevin Lee Barkley appeals the 18-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of counterfeiting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 471 , one count of producing false documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (a)(1), and one count of possession of false identification document implements, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (a)(5). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Barkley contends that the district court erred when it enhanced his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 265.1(b)(2) (increasing offense level to 15 where defendant manufactured or produced any counterfeit obligation or possessed a counterfeiting device). This contention lacks merit.

*548 We review de novo the district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines, and its factual findings for clear error. United States v. Taylor, 991 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.1993).

Because there was evidence supporting the district court’s finding that the bills' were of a “remarkable” quality and that Barkley’s counterfeiting operation was more sophisticated than mere photocopying, the district court properly applied U.S.S.G. § 2B5.1(b)(2). Taylor, 991 F.2d at 535 (concluding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.