Lomeli-Diaz

United States v. Lomeli-Diaz

Good Law
12 F. App'x 580
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 2001No. 00-50765; D.C. No. CR-00-02456-TJWCalifornia359 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Lomeli-Diaz pleaded guilty to illegal reentry pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) and he was sentenced to 57 months in prison pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2). He appeals this sentence. The facts and prior proceedings are known to the parties; they are not restated herein except as necessary. We affirm.

The maximum penalty for illegal reentry is two years in prison, 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a), unless one of the enhancements in 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b) applies. One of these enhancements, which increases the maximum penalty for illegal reentry to twenty years if the defendant had been previously convicted of an aggravated felony at the time of his removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2), applies in this case.

The sentence Lomeli-Diaz challenges in this appeal is well within the twenty year maximum provided for in 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2). Nonetheless, he argues that, because his prior conviction was neither charged in the indictment for illegal reentry nor proved beyond a reasonable doubt before the jury in this case, it violated the Due Process Clause and the Sixth Amendment to increase, on the basis of his prior conviction, the maximum sentence he could receive from two to twenty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.