Walter Lee Collins v. S. Moore, Program Administrator H. Whitley, Correctional Counselor II M. McMann Correctional Counselor I

81 F.3d 167 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Walter Lee COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S. MOORE, Program Administrator; H. Whitley, Correctional Counselor II; M. McMann, Correctional Counselor I, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16295. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided March 29, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Walter Lee Collins, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Botefur v. City of Eagle Point, 7 F.3d 152, 154 (9th Cir.1993), and affirm. 3 Collins contends that his right to due process was violated when prison officials classified him as a sex offender resulting in Collins being denied certain work privileges. Because the denial of work privileges resulting from a particular…