Cook Inlet Cruises, Inc. v. Veco, Inc., Cook Inlet Cruises, Inc. v. Veco, Inc.

81 F.3d 167 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. COOK INLET CRUISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VECO, INC., Defendant-Appellee. COOK INLET CRUISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VECO, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-35912, 94-36021. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 1995. Decided March 27, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 VECO, Inc. ("VECO") executed a time charter party with Cook Inlet Cruises, Inc. ("CICI") for the use of the latter's 45-foot motorized catamaran. VECO also executed a bareboat charter party for the use of a floating dock (the "Barge"). Claiming that VECO returned the Barge in damaged condition, CICI invoked a provision of the bareboat charter requiring payment of continuing daily rent for the use of the Barge until VECO repaired it. CICI also invoked the time charter's "tying" clause to extend the lease of the catamaran for the period covered by the…