Larry E. Belton, Sr. v. Superior Court of California, Sacramento Dorothy Brown Vinson Mable Rushin Yorquincia Rushin Carl B. Smith

81 F.3d 167 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Larry E. BELTON, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO; Dorothy Brown Vinson; Mable Rushin; Yorquincia Rushin; Carl B. Smith, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15548. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided March 29, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Larry E. Belton, Sr. appeals pro se the district court's dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Sacramento County Superior Court and two private attorneys. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations filed October 27, 1994, which the district court adopted in full on February 14, 1995. Moreover, the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Belton's action to the extent that he…