Roberto J. Aguilar-Salazar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
81 F.3d 167·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20668
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 199694-70775California1,040 words

Opinion

Opinion

81 F.3d 167 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Roberto J. AGUILAR-SALAZAR, et al., Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70775. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 15, 1996. * Decided March 28, 1996. 1 Before: BEEZER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and ZILLY, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Roberto Aguilar-Salazar, along with his wife and three children, natives and citizens of Nicaragua, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 and 1253. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny the petition. 4 * Roberto Aguilar-Salazar ("Aguilar") entered the United States on June 9, 1988, on a non-immigrant visa valid for one year. He remained in the United States after his visa expired, and has never sought or obtained a visa extension. Aguilar's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.