Herbert Adolph v. Eunice Tsing Yung Louie Tsing Yung Edward Tsing Yung

81 F.3d 167 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Herbert ADOLPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eunice Tsing YUNG; Louie Tsing Yung; Edward Tsing Yung, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15716. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided March 29, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Herbert Adolph appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his personal injury action for failure to prosecute, interference with discovery, and giving false testimony at his deposition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We vacate the district court's judgment and remand for the district court to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction. 3 On February 16, 1994, Adolph, a German citizen, filed an action against Crawford & Company, a Georgia corporation, for personal injuries he allegedly incurred when he fell down stairs in San Francisco in 1993. Crawford & Company moved to…