Hendon v. Lewis

Good Law
81 F.3d 168·1996 WL 145272·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20985
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 199695-15859California518 words

Opinion

Opinion

81 F.3d 168 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald James HENDON, a/k/a Steven Michael Vann, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS; George Herman; John Hallahan; Bill Gotcher; Glen Parin; Captain Brenan; Captain Taylor; Lt. Shelton; Lt. Flannigan; Lt. Anderson; Sgt. Vencimora; Sgt. Wilson; Sgt. Jones; Sgt. Vertrees; CPO Phillips, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15859. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided March 29, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Steven Michael Vann, the prevailing party in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, appeals pro se from the district court's order denying costs, filed following this court's remand for the award of reasonable costs. See Hendon v. Lewis, No. 93-15585, unpublished memorandum disposition (9th Cir. July 6, 1994). We affirm. 3 First, we reject appellees' contention that the April 25, 1995 notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.