Rolland Richard Henry v. The County of Shasta State of California

81 F.3d 168 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rolland Richard HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The COUNTY OF SHASTA; State of California, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 94-17045, 95-15306, 95-15316. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 4, 1995. * Decided March 26, 1996. Before: BROWNING, CANBY and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff-Appellant Rolland Richard Henry appeals the district court's denial of two motions for preliminary injunctions in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the County of Shasta, California Highway Patrol officers, and other state and county defendants violated his civil rights by arresting him for refusing to sign a notice to appear when he was stopped and cited for traffic infractions. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1). 3 The district court's denials of Henry's motions for preliminary injunctions are the only issues before us on appeal. This Court…