Flanagan v. Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp.

Good Law
81 F.3d 168·1996 WL 157508·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20965
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 199694-16965California3,281 words

Opinion

Opinion

81 F.3d 168 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Bruce FLANAGAN; Joan Flanagan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant, and Howard Arnaiz; Helen Rae Byrnes; Patricia A. Carson; Clyde C. Cournale; Roy M. Guinnane; Sidney Lewin; Smith Ketchum, III; Joseph Moore; Shirley Talbot, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16965. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 15, 1996. Decided April 4, 1996. Before: REINHARDT, THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The district court approved a settlement agreement, and in its judgment dismissing the claims it retained jurisdiction over all matters arising out of the settlement agreement. Years later, after unsuccessfully attempting to litigate matters in the state courts, plaintiffs filed a supplemental complaint in the district court alleging violations of the settlement agreement. The causes of action are for breach of contract,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.