Hickman v. Block

81 F.3d 168 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Douglas Ray HICKMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sherman BLOCK; Claude L. Farris; Patrick G. Leonard; City of Los Angeles; Darryl Gates, Police Chief; Robert Talcott; Herbert Boekmann; Reva B. Tooley; Samuel L. Williams; Stephen D. Yslas; William Cowdin; Frank E. Piersol; Dominick J. Rivetti; City of San Fernando; County of Los Angeles, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55836. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 13, 1995. Decided April 5, 1996. 1 Before: HALL and JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges, and SHUBB, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Douglas Ray Hickman appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of the appellees in his action arising out of the appellees' successive refusals to grant him a concealed weapons permit. Hickman's complaint alleged various theories of liability under 42 U.S.C. sections 1983 and 1985(3). Viewing the evidence in the light most…