Lewis Edward Franklin v. State of Oregon City of Portland Pat Campbell, Ops/youth Gang Task Force Officer Steve Hollingsworth Glen Campbell Keith Killian Bill Brooks Bob King, Lewis Edward Franklin v. Charles H. Turner Michael J. Brown Neil Goldschmidt David Frohnmayer Bud Clark Michael Shrunk

Good Law
81 F.3d 168·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20975
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 199694-35364California1,169 words

Opinion

Opinion

81 F.3d 168 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lewis Edward FRANKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, et al.; City of Portland; Pat Campbell, OPS/Youth Gang Task Force Officer; Steve Hollingsworth; Glen Campbell; Keith Killian; Bill Brooks; Bob King; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Lewis Edward FRANKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles H. TURNER; Michael J. Brown; Neil Goldschmidt; David Frohnmayer; Bud Clark; Michael Shrunk, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. CA 94-35364, CA 94-35768. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 9, 1995. Decided March 26, 1996. Before: CANBY, REINHARDT and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges * . MEMORANDUM ** In these cases, Lewis Edward Franklin, a federal prisoner, appeals the dismissal of two nearly-identical civil rights actions. We consolidate the two appeals for purposes of disposition. The amended complaints in both actions were dismissed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) (6) for failure to state a claim. The gravamen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.