King Crab, Inc. v. Seattle Refrigeration, Inc.

81 F.3d 168 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. KING CRAB, INC., an Alaska corporation; Ocean Beauty Alaska, Inc., an Alaska corporation; Ocean Pride Alaska, Inc., an Alaska Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SEATTLE REFRIGERATION, INC., a Washington corporation; Jones Chemicals, Inc., a New York corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Joseph NUNES, Plaintiff, v. KING CRAB, INC., an Alaska corporation; Ocean Beauty Alaska, Inc., an Alaska corporation; Ocean Pride Alaska, Inc., an Alaska corporation, Defendants/Cross-Defendants/Appellants, v. SEATTLE REFRIGERATION, INC., a Washington corporation; Jones Chemicals, Inc., a New York corporation, Defendants/Cross-Defendants/Appellees. No. 94-36228. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 1995. Decided March 29, 1996. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 King Crab, Inc., Ocean Beauty Alaska, Inc., and Ocean Pride Alaska, Inc. (collectively "Ocean…