Victorio C. Rivera v. Barbara Roberts, Chief Executive Officer Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General of the State of Oregon Robert C. Cannon, Legal Counsel for Marion County Dale Penn, District Attorney and Chief Public Prosecutor, Victorio C. Rivera v. M. Chapin Milbank David Wilson Gary R. Tesch Tony J. Whisman Stephanie L. Whisman

Good Law
81 F.3d 169·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20915
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 199695-35075California856 words

Opinion

Opinion

81 F.3d 169 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Victorio C. RIVERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barbara ROBERTS, Chief Executive Officer; Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General of the State of Oregon; Robert C. Cannon, Legal Counsel for Marion County; Dale Penn, District Attorney and Chief Public Prosecutor, Defendants-Appellees. Victorio C. RIVERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. Chapin MILBANK; David Wilson; Gary R. Tesch; Tony J. Whisman; Stephanie L. Whisman, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 94-36126, 95-35075. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided March 29, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated appeals, Victorio C. Rivera appeals pro se the district court's two summary judgments dismissing his civil rights actions against the Governor of Oregon, Oregon state and local law enforcement officials and various private citizens. Rivera's complaints alleged that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.