National Labor Relations Board v. Bartlett Nuclear, Inc.

Good Law
81 F.3d 169·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20918
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 199694-70508California1,272 words

Opinion

Opinion

81 F.3d 169 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. BARTLETT NUCLEAR, INC., Respondent. No. 94-70508. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1996. * Decided March 28, 1996. 1 ORDER ENFORCED. 2 Before: PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, ** District Judge. 3 MEMORANDUM *** OVERVIEW 4 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (Union) filed unfair labor charges against Bartlett Nuclear, Inc. (BNI), concerning actions that took place during a labor strike at a temporary BNI job assignment at Pacific Gas & Electric's (PG & E's) Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant (Diablo Canyon). After a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued a decision finding that BNI violated § 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act (Act), 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a)(1) and (3). The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) affirmed the violations found by the ALJ and adopted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.