United States v. Maximino Felix-Miranda

81 F.3d 171 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maximino FELIX-MIRANDA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10302. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided March 29, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Maximino Felix-Miranda appeals his sentence of fifty-one months after pleading guilty to illegal reentry following conviction of an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We review the legality of a sentence de novo. United States v. Redmond, 69 F.3d 979, 980 (9th Cir.1995). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 3 Felix-Miranda contends that the district court imposed a sentence in excess of the plea agreement before allowing Felix-Miranda an opportunity to reject the plea in violation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11. The record belies this contention. 4 "Plea agreements are subject to contract-law…