John Wills v. Dean Hardy, an Individual, and John Moran, Individual

81 F.3d 171 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John WILLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dean HARDY, an individual, Defendant, and John Moran, individual, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-15913. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided March 29, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Wills appeals pro se the district court's (1) dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against his former attorney Dean Hardy, and (2) grant of summary judgment in favor of Clark County Sheriff John Moran. In his complaint, Wills asserted that his right to due process was violated when the sheriff's department improperly executed a state court judgment against Wills by serving it upon Wills's bank. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert.…