United States v. Olin B. Kicklighter

81 F.3d 171 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Olin B. KICKLIGHTER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10134. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided March 29, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Olin B. Kicklighter appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) motion and his motion to correct his alleged illegal sentence. 1 Kicklighter was sentenced to 180-month imprisonment in 1990 following a jury conviction for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine and manufacture of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846, and for use of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1). 2 The government argues that we lack jurisdiction over Kicklighter's appeal. We agree that jurisdiction is lacking…