United States v. Dewayne Paul Gipson

81 F.3d 171 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dewayne Paul GIPSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30085. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 7, 1996. Decided March 29, 1996. Before: REINHARDT, KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Dewayne Paul Gipson appeals his conviction, which followed a conditional guilty plea to manufacturing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). He appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a Franks 1 evidentiary hearing and the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his property. We affirm. DISCUSSION A. Motion to Suppress 3 "The validity of a search warrant depends upon the sufficiency of what is found within the four corners of the underlying affidavit." United States v. Taylor, 716 F.2d 701, 705 (9th Cir.1983) (citing United States v. Martinez, 588 F.2d 1227, 1234 (9th…