United States v. Jermaine Hodrick and Gerald Sparks, Jr.
Opinion
Opinion
81 F.3d 171 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jermaine HODRICK and Gerald Sparks, Jr., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 94-50549, 94-50554. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 5, 1996. Decided April 3, 1996. Before: WALLACE, FERGUSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Jermaine Ruben Hodrick and Gerald Sparks, Jr., appeal their jury convictions for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) and (d) and use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). For the reasons stated below, the convictions are AFFIRMED. 3 Since the parties are familiar with the facts, we need not recite them here. DISCUSSION Motion to Suppress 4 A police officer may stop a person if the officer has a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the person has just committed a crime. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 31 (1968). The…