United States v. Bradley William Groceman, United States of America v. Jeffrey Dean Groceman

81 F.3d 171 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bradley William GROCEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Dean GROCEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-30017, 95-30135 and 95-30245. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 7, 1996. Decided March 28, 1996. 1 Before: WRIGHT, HALL, and TROTT, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Brothers Jeffrey and Bradley Groceman appeal their convictions of armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113 , and conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 371 . We affirm. I. 4 The brothers Groceman first argue that their criminal sentences are barred by the Double Jeopardy clause. See United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, 33 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir.1994), cert. granted sub nom. United States v. Ursery, 116 S.Ct. 762 (U.S. Jan. 12, 1996) (Nos. 95-345, 95-346). Bradley Groceman waived this claim by…