Thomas

Thomas v. Wright

Good Law
13 F. App'x 524
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 2001No. 98-35384; D.C. No. CV-97-05513-RJBCalifornia311 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Tyrone Fitzgerald Thomas, a Washington state prisoner, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 1992 conviction of first degree possession of stolen property. The district court found that the petition was filed untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 , as amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c) and, after de novo review, we affirm.

Title 28, U.S. Code section 2244 (d) provides in pertinent part:

Thomas’s state court conviction became final on May 8, 1996, ninety days after the Washington State Supreme Court affirmed his conviction. See Bowen v. Roe, 188 F.3d 1157, 1158-59 (9th Cir.1999) (concluding that the AEDPA’s one-year limitations period does not start to run until the time for petitioner to seek certiorari from the United States Supreme Court has run, even if a petitioner declines to take such action). Accordingly, the one-year period of limitations for him to file a federal habeas petition expired on May 8, 1997. Thomas’s petition, filed in the district court on August 12, 1999, was untimely by approximately two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.