Romero-Cortez

United States v. Romero-Cortez

Good Law
13 F. App'x 541
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 2001No. 00-30279; D.C. No. CR-00-00181-RHWCalifornia222 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Mario Romero-Cortez appeals the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being an alien found in the United States after deportation. Romero-Cortez contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court erred in imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) based upon a prior felony to which he did not admit, and which was not submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. He *542 also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense), because he did not admit to an aggravated felony at his change of plea hearing. His arguments are foreclosed by this court’s recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), as amended (Feb. 8, 2001). United States v. Castillo-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020, 1024-25 (9th Cir.2001). We deny his request to stay these proceedings.

AFFIRMED.

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.