Juarez-Ramos

United States v. Juarez-Ramos

Good Law
13 F. App'x 601
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 2001No. 00-50536; D.C. No. CR-00-01465-HBTCalifornia496 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Magdalena Juarez-Ramos was arrested for importing approximately fifty-two kilograms of marijuana into the United States. The government offered Juarez-Ramos a plea bargain under the “fast track” procedure for handling routine drug importation cases. Juarez-Ramos rejected the proposed plea agreement and pleaded not guilty to the indictment. However, without accepting the plea agreement, Juarez-Ramos subsequently pleaded guilty to importing marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. The district court sentenced Juarez-Ramos to twelve months and one day imprisonment and three years supervised release. Juarez-Ramos appeals her conviction and sentence; we vacate her sentence and remand to the district court for resentencing, without prejudice to her arguments concerning the validity of her conviction.

I.

Juarez-Ramos argues that 21 U.S.C. § 960 is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Alternatively, Juarez-Ramos argues that § 960 requires that she had knowledge of the type and quantity of the controlled substance at issue, and that the district court erred under Federal Rule of Criminal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.